SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrantx                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant:¨

Check the appropriate box:

OYO Geospace Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

January 16, 200718, 2008

Dear Fellow Stockholder:

I am pleased to invite you to attend OYO Geospace Corporation’s 20072008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We will hold the meeting at 9:00 a.m. on the 21st28th of February 2007,2008 at the company’s corporate headquarters at 7007 Pinemont Drive, Houston, Texas, 77040-6601.

Following this letter you will find the formal Notice of Meeting and a proxy statement which describes the action to be taken at the meeting. We have enclosed a proxy card so that you may grant your proxy to be voted as you indicate. We have also enclosed a copy of our 20062007 Annual Report. We encourage you to read these materials.

Your vote is important.Please complete and mail your proxy card promptly, whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting. If you attend the meeting you may vote in person even if you have mailed a signed and dated proxy.

The board of directors recommends that you voteFOR the election of directors as described in the attached proxy statement.

Thank you for your cooperation. The rest of the board of directors and I look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

Very truly yours,

Gary D. Owens

Chairman of the Board, President

and Chief Executive Officer

OYO Geospace Corporation

7007 Pinemont Drive

Houston, Texas 77040-6601

January 16, 200718, 2008

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held February 21, 200728, 2008

The Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of OYO Geospace Corporation will be held at 9:00 a.m. on the 21st28th of February 2007,2008, at the company’s corporate headquarters at 7007 Pinemont Drive, Houston, Texas, to elect two directors, each to hold office until the 20102011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until his successor is duly elected and qualified and to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

The holders of record of OYO Geospace Corporation common stock at the close of business on December 27, 2006January 2, 2008 will be entitled to vote at the meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Charles H. Still

Secretary

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please sign, date and mail the enclosed proxy card promptly. If you attend the meeting you may vote in person even if you have mailed a signed and dated proxy.

OYO Geospace Corporation

Proxy Statement

January 16, 200718, 2008

The board of directors of OYO Geospace Corporation (the “Company”) is soliciting proxies from its stockholders for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held at 9:00 a.m. on the 21st28th of February 2007,2008 at the Company’s corporate headquarters at 7007 Pinemont Drive, Houston, Texas, and for any adjournment thereof.

You are entitled to vote at that meeting if you were a holder of record of the Company’s common stock at the close of business on December 27, 2006.January 2, 2008. On January 16, 2007,18, 2008, the Company began mailing to stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting a proxy card, this proxy statement and the Company’s 20062007 Annual Report. On December 27, 2006,January 2, 2008, there were 5,747,6085,898,408 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding. Each share of common stock entitles the holder to one vote on each matter considered at the meeting.

Your proxy card will appoint Mr. Ryuzo OkutoCharles H. Still and Thomas L. Davis, Ph. D.Mr. Katsuhiko Kobayashi. as proxy holders, or your representatives, to vote your shares as you indicate. If you sign, date and return your proxy card without specifying voting instructions, the proxy holders will vote your sharesFOR the election of the director nominees named in this proxy statement.

Signing, dating and returning your proxy card does not preclude you from attending the meeting and voting in person. If you submit more than one proxy, the latest-date proxy will automatically revoke your previous proxy. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by sending written notice, to be delivered before the meeting, to: Computershare Investor Services, 350 Indiana Street, Suite 800, Golden, Colorado 80401.

The enclosed form of proxy provides a means for you to vote for the director nominees listed in this proxy statement or to withhold authority to vote for such nominees.

The board of directors expects the nominees named in this proxy statement to be available for election. If any nominee is not available, the proxy holders may vote your shares for a substitute if you have submitted a signed and dated proxy card that does not withhold authority to vote for nominees.

The Company is not aware of any matters to be brought before the meeting other than those described in this proxy statement. If any other matters not now known are properly brought by the Company before the meeting, and if you return a signed, dated proxy card, the proxy holders may vote your shares in their discretion as to those other matters.

No business can be conducted at the meeting unless a majority of all outstanding shares entitled to vote is either present at the meeting in person or represented by proxy. The two nominees who receive the most votes will be elected to the two open directorships even if they receive less than a majority of the votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as shares present for determining a quorum, but they are not counted as votes for or against any director. There are no rights of appraisal or similar dissenters’ rights with respect to any matter to be acted upon pursuant to this Proxy Statement.

Representatives of Computershare Investors Services, the transfer agent and registrar for the common stock, will act as the inspectors of election at the meeting.

PROPOSAL I : ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

At the meeting, the stockholders will elect two directors. The board of directors is divided into three classes, each class being composed as equally in number as possible. The classes have staggered three-year terms, with the term of one class expiring at each annual meeting of stockholders.

The directors in Class III,I, whose terms expire at the meeting, are WilliamMr. Ryuzo Okuto and Thomas L. Davis, Ph. D. Mr. Okuto has declined to stand for reelection. The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Company has selected Mr. Richard C. White to replace Mr. Okuto as a director of the Company. Mr. White is one of several candidates considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Potential candidates were named by members of the board of directors at a special meeting called by the Nominating and Governance Committee following Mr. Okuto’s retirement announcement. The Nominating and Governance Committee considered suggestions and comments from the full board of directors, including Mr. Okuto, in its decision. Criteria used to select potential candidates included, without limitation, (1) independence, (2) qualified to serve on the Audit Committee of the Company, (3) qualified to serve on the Compensation Committee of the Company, (4) experience in the seismic industry, (5) knowledge of the oil and gas industry, (6) knowledge of operating a manufacturing company, and (7) a collaborative, persuasive and articulate personality. Mr. White met with Mr. Charles H. MoodyStill, chairman of the Nominating and Gary D. Owens. Messrs. MoodyGovernance Committee, and Owensthe board of directors as a whole on separate occasions. Members of the board of directors contacted references of Mr. White, who provided additional positive reports. After multiple discussions, the Nominating and Governance Committee determined that Mr. White satisfied the criteria considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee, and nominated Mr. White to stand for election as Mr. Okuto’s successor on the board of directors of the Company.

Dr. Davis and Mr. White have been nominated by the nominating and corporate governance committee to serve as Class IIII directors for anothera three-year term expiring at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The directors in Class I are serving terms that expire at the 20082011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The directors in Class II are serving terms that expire at the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The directors in Class III are serving terms that expire at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Only Dr. Davis, Mr. Okuto,White, Mr. Moody and Mr. Still are independent, as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the National Association of Securities Dealer’s listing standards as currently applicable to the Company.

The board of directors has previously determined the independence of Dr. Davis. The board of directors considered Mr. White’s prior positions in the industry and his personal relationship with Mr. Owens in making its independence determination with regard to Mr. White. No specific transactions existed that needed to be considered in determining Mr. White’s independence.

2

Information regarding the director nominees and directors whose terms will continue after the meeting follows.

Background of Nominees and Continuing Directors

Thomas L. Davis, Ph.D. became a director in connection with the Company’s initial public offering in November 1997. Dr. Davis is a Professor of Geophysics at the Colorado School of Mines, where he has worked since 1980. He has also been a coordinator of the Reservoir Characterization Project, an industry consortium of the Colorado School of Mines, since it was founded in 1985, with the objective of characterizing reservoirs through development and application of 3-D and time lapse 3-D multicomponent seismology. Dr. Davis consults and lectures worldwide and has written and co-edited numerous papers and other works in the field of seismic interpretation.

Ryuzo OkutoRichard C. White is the former President and Chief Executive Officer of NuTec Energy Services Inc. He held that position from October 2001, until his retirement from NuTec in September 2002. He was Chief Executive Officer of Veritas DGC Land, Inc. from January 2000 through June 2000. From 1995 until his retirement in October 1999, Mr. White served as President of Western Geophysical Company, as well as Senior Vice President of Western Atlas Inc. He also served as Vice President of Baker Hughes Incorporated from August 1998 until October 1999. Prior to 1995, he held various other executive positions with Western Geophysical Company, including Chief Operating Officer. Mr. White graduated from Bloomsburg University in 1978. Mr. White has been a director since Julyserved on the board of 2004. Mr. Okuto joined Sanwa Bank in April, 1961 where he worked in various positions in offices throughout the world. Mr. Okuto was a Managing Directordirectors of Chisso Corporation from June 1993 to June 2001.two public companies.

2

Katsuhiko Kobayashijoined OYO Corporation, the sole stockholder of OYO U.S.A., in 1995 and has been a director and a senior executive officer since March 2001. Mr. Kobayashi was elected to serve as the President of OYO U.S.A. on May 31, 2002 and is currently serving in that position. He has served as a director of the Company since 1995. From 1967 to 1995, Mr. Kobayashi was employed by Sanwa Bank in its international banking area, where he last held the position of general manager of the International Credit Administration Department from 1993 to 1995.

3

Michael J. Sheenjoined the Company as Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer in August 1997 and became a director in connection with the Company’s initial public offering in 1997. Mr. Sheen had been a Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer of Input/Output, Inc. beginning in 1991 and had held other positions at Input/Output, Inc. starting in 1977.

Charles H. Stillbecame a director in connection with the Company’s initial public offering in 1997. He has been Secretary, serving in a non-executive capacity, since the Company’s formation in September 1994 and Secretary of various affiliates and predecessors of the Company since 1980. He has been a partner in the law firm of Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. since 1975. As of January 1, 2008, Mr. Still retired as a partner in that firm and became Of Counsel.

William H. Moody has been a director since July of 2004. Mr. Moody served with KPMG in many capacities including managing partner, audit partner-in-charge and Securities and Exchange Commission reviewing partner until his retirement in June 1996. Mr. Moody is also a member of the board of directors, and a member of the audit committee of the board of directors, of Remote Knowledge, Inc., a position he has held since November 2004.

Gary D. Owensjoined the Company as President and Chief Executive Officer in 1997 and became a director and Chairman of the board in that year. From October 1993 until May of 1997, Mr. Owens was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Input/Output, Inc. Mr. Owens had held other positions at Input/Output, Inc. beginning in 1977.

Nominations to the Board of Directors

All of the members of the nominating and corporate governance committee are independent, as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the National Association of Securities Dealer’s listing standards as currently applicable to the Company. The charter for the nominating and corporate governance committee is available on the Company’s website. The address of the Company’s website is http://www.oyogeospace.com.

The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for reviewing and interviewing qualified candidates to serve on the board of directors, for making recommendations for nominations to fill vacancies on the board of directors, and for selecting the nominees for election by the Company’s stockholders at each annual meeting. The nominating and corporate governance committee has not established specific minimum age, education, experience or skill requirements for potential directors. The nominating and corporate governance committee has taken into account all factors it has considered appropriate in fulfilling its responsibilities to identify and recommend individuals as director nominees. Those factors have included, without limitation, the following:

3

The nominating and corporate governance committee has utilized a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the nominating and corporate governance committee through current board members, professional search firms, stockholders or other persons. Candidates have been evaluated at regular or special meetings of the nominating and corporate governance committee, and may be considered at any point during the year.

4

The nominating and corporate governance committee will consider qualified nominees recommended by stockholders. Stockholders desiring to make such recommendations should submit such recommendations to the Company Secretary, c/o OYO Geospace Corporation, 7007 Pinemont Drive, Houston, Texas 77040-6601. The nominating and corporate governance committee will evaluate candidates properly proposed by stockholders in the same manner as all other candidates.

Communications with the Board

Any stockholder or other interested party wishing to send written communications to any one or more members of the Company’s board of directors may do so by sending them to the Company Secretary, c/o OYO Geospace Corporation, 7007 Pinemont Drive, Houston, Texas 77040-6601. All such communications will be forwarded to the intended recipient(s).

Committees of the Board of Directors and Meeting Attendance

The board of directors has a standing audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee.

The audit committee is charged with, among other tasks, recommending to the entire board the engagement and discharge of independent auditors of the financial statements of the Company, reviewing and pre-approving the professional services provided by independent auditors, reviewing the independence of independent auditors, reviewing with the auditors the plan and results of the auditing engagement, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviewing the Company’s system of internal accounting controls. The audit committee met sevenfive times during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.2007. The audit committee’s report appears below in this proxy statement. The board of directors of the Company has made a determination that Mr. Moody, a member of its audit committee who is independent, is athe audit committee financial expert. Mr. Moody’s background is described above under “Background of Nominees and Continuing Directors.”

The compensation committee is charged with recommending to the entire board the compensation to be paid to officers and key employees of the Company and the compensation of members of the board of directors. The compensation committee also makes recommendations to the entire board regarding the grant of stock options and restricted stock awards. The compensation committee met three times during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.2007. The compensation committee’s report on executive compensation for fiscal 2006year 2007 appears below in this proxy statement.

The nominating and corporate governance committee is charged with, among other things, identifying and recommending nominees for election to the Company’s board of directors at annual meetings and filling vacancies on the Company’s board, recommending nominees for appointment to the Company’s committees, annually reviewing the overall effectiveness of the organization of the board and the committees thereof, developing and maintaining qualification criteria and procedures for the identification and recruitment of candidates for election to serve as directors, and annually reviewing the directors, its own performance and its charter. The nominating and corporate governance committee will consider nominees recommended by stockholders. With respect to procedures that must be followed in order for nominations from stockholders to be considered, see “Nominations to the Board of Directors” above. The nominating and corporate governance committee met one timetwice during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.2007.

4

The board of directors met six times during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.2007.

The Company’s independent directors meet in executive sessions held immediately followingpreceding regularly scheduled board meetings, in conjunction with the meetings of the Company’s audit committee which is comprised of independent directors. In fiscal year 2006,2007, independent directors met in executive sessions fourthree times.

5

Each director attended, in person or by telephone, at least 75% of the meetings held by the board of directors and by the committees on which the director served. The Company’s board of directors holds a regular meeting in conjunction with the annual meeting of stockholders. Therefore, the directors are encouraged to and generally attend the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. All of the Company’s directors attended the 20062007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Certain corporate governance rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers, or the NASD, other than those relating to the Company’s audit committee, have historically not been applicable to the Company because the Company has been a Controlled Company under NASD rules. The Company has historically been a Controlled Company under NASD rules because OYO Corporation U.S.A., or “OYO U.S.A.,” has owned more than 50% of the Company’s common stock. On August 12, 2005, OYO Corporation, through OYO U.S.A., its wholly owned subsidiary sold 1,400,000 shares of Company common stock in a secondary offering. Following this secondary offering, OYO Corporation, through OYO U.S.A., owns 20.0%approximately 20.2% of the Company’s common stock. Thus the Company is no longer a Controlled Company under NASD rules, and as such, is no longer exempt from various NASD corporate governance rules from which Controlled Companies are exempt.

Audit Committee Report

We have reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 20062007 with management and have discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopersUHY LLP, certified public accountants, the independent auditors for the Company, the matters required to be discussed by SAS 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU Section 380) with respect to those statements. We have received the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopersUHY LLP required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees) and have discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopersUHY LLP its independence in connection with its audit of the Company’s most recent annual financial statements. Based on this review and these discussions, we recommended to the board of directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.2007.

Thomas L. Davis, Ph.D., William H. Moody and Ryuzo Okuto arewere the members of the audit committee during fiscal year 2007. If elected, Richard C. White will replace Mr. Okuto as a member of the committee. Dr. Davis, Mr. Moody, Mr. Okuto and Mr. OkutoWhite are independent, as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the National Association of Securities Dealer’s listing standards as currently applicable to the Company.

The board of directors has adopted a written charter for the audit committee. The audit committee has reviewed and reassessed the adequacy of its charter on an annual basis.

The information in this Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be soliciting material, or be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate these paragraphs by reference.

Thomas L. Davis, Ph.D.

William H. Moody

Ryuzo Okuto

56

Compensation of Directors

Until December 3, 2004, non-employeeFebruary 21, 2007, the compensation to be paid to directors were compensated for their services at a rate of $25,000was $27,500 per year, of which one-half was$12,500 is payable in cash and the remaining portion is payable in shares of common stock based on the fair market value thereof on the date of issuance pursuant to the Company’s 1997 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan, or the “Director Plan”. On December 3, 2004, the board of directors of the Company approved an increase in the compensation

Additionally, prior to be paid to directors to $27,500 per year, of which $12,500 is payable in cash and the remaining portion is payable in shares of common stock.

PursuantFebruary 21, 2007, pursuant to the Director Plan, each non-employee director serving on the board of directors following each annual meeting of stockholders also receivesreceived a grant of options to acquire 3,150 shares of common stock at the fair market value on the date of that grant. Mr. Kobayashi has not accepted this annual stipend or any stock options to date. All directors are reimbursed for ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in attending board and committee meetings.

On February 21, 2007, the board of directors of the Company approved a new compensation structure for non-employee directors, as recommended by the Compensation Committee. Under this new structure, each non-employee director will receive $75,000 in cash, paid in four equal quarterly installments. The chairman of the audit committee will receive an additional $10,000 in cash, paid in four equal quarterly installments. Pursuant to an amendment to the Director Plan adopted at the same meeting, the Annual Options will no longer be granted. The Board also adopted a policy that over the next three years all non-employee directors shall acquire through open market purchases an ownership interest in the Company’s Common Stock with an aggregate value based on cost of $50,000.

The following table summarizes compensation paid to each non-employee director during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007:

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Directors receive the director compensation payments irrespective of meeting attendance. During fiscal year 2007, each director attended, in person or by telephone, at least 75% of the meetings held by the board of directors and by the committees on which the director served.

7

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table indicates the beneficial ownership as of December 27, 2006,31, 2007, of shares of the Company’s common stock of each director and named executive officer, each person known to the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding common stock and all directors and named executive officers as a group, along with the percentage of outstanding common stock that such ownership represents. The Company based the information regarding beneficial ownership by third persons of more than 5% of its outstanding capital stock on a search of all Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the Company’s stock. Each person named has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated except as otherwise stated in the notes to the table.

7

8

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND COMPENSATION

Information regarding the named executive officers follows:

Thomas T. McEntirejoined the Company as Chief Financial Officer in September of 1997. Mr. McEntire had been Financial Controller of APS Holding Corporation (“APS”) beginning in February 1995 and held other senior financial management positions since joining APS in 1990. Prior to joining APS, Mr. McEntire held various positions with Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. from 1982 to 1990.

Lacey C. Rice joined the Company as Vice President of Human Resources in July of 2004. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Rice was the payroll manager for U.S. operations at Schlumberger Oilfield Services. Prior to joining Schlumberger in February 2002, Ms. Rice held senior level positions in human resources with Baker Oil Tools and Baker Hughes, Inc., from 1998 to 2002; and Input/Output, Inc. from 1977 to 1997.

Mr. Owens’ and Mr. Sheen’s backgrounds are described above under “Background of Nominees and Continuing Directors”.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

8

SummaryObjectives of Compensation Program

A summaryOur executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain talented management personnel and to reward management for the Company’s successful financial performance and for increasing stockholder value. We provide compensation and incentives through a combination of salaries, annual performance bonuses and long-term incentive stock-based awards. While the amounts may be different, each of the components of the compensation earned bypackage is the namedsame and is applied using similar methodology as further discussed below under “Elements of Compensation.” Exceptions to this principle are generally due to local market requirements.

Executive officers generally receive the same benefits as other employees. Any differences are generally due to position, seniority, or local requirements. In line with this philosophy, executive officers in the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 which is required to be disclosed herein follows:

Information regarding unexercised options held by the named executive officers as of September 30, 2006 which is required to be disclosed herein follows.

None of the above named executive officers exercised any options in fiscal year 2006. The value of unexercised options is based on the $56.75 closing price of our common stock on September 29, 2006.

Employment Agreements

receive minimal perquisites. Messrs. Owens and Sheen have entered into employment agreements with the Company. Mr. Owens’Company, which provide them with certain severance benefits upon their termination of employment. See “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” below for more information on these benefits. Our compensation policies are designed to enhance our financial performance and shareholder value by aligning the financial interests of the executive officers and employees with those of our shareholders.

Finally, we endeavor to ensure that our compensation program is perceived as fundamentally fair to all stockholders.

What Our Compensation is Designed to Reward

Our compensation program is designed to reward teamwork and each individual’s contribution to the Company as well as to produce positive long-term results for our shareholders and employees.

9

Administration

The Compensation Committee is composed entirely of three non-employee members of the Board of Directors. No Compensation Committee member participates in any of our employee compensation programs. The Compensation Committee (i) reviews and approves annual compensation for the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, (ii) reviews the compensation program for all other executive officers as recommended to the Committee by the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and (iii) reviews and approves the annual awards under equity incentive plans and the non-equity incentive program to all employees as recommended to the Committee by management.

The Committee does not currently engage any consultant related to executive compensation matters.

Elements of Compensation

General

The primary elements of the executive compensation program consist of (1) base salary, (2) annual cash bonuses pursuant to a non-equity incentive program, and (3) equity awards. Equity awards have historically included non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards. Each executive’s current and prior compensation is $200,000,considered in setting future compensation and Mr. Sheen’s annualconsideration is given to the vesting and value of previously granted equity awards. In addition, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer focuses on relative compensation throughout the organization in recommending his own compensation and that of other executive officers.

The Company chooses to pay each element of compensation to reward executives through various means. The base salary is $175,000. These salaries may be adjustedand employee benefits compensate executives for their daily efforts as management of the Company. The cash bonus program, described in more detail below, encourages executives to not only meet their personal goals for the company, measured in terms of consolidated pretax profits (before bonus), but to encourage other employees to meet personal goals as well. The top executives do not benefit from the cash bonus program until all other employees have maximized their potential bonuses under the program. The stock awards provide an incentive to improve the performance of the Company as viewed by the boardmarket.

Total compensation received by any executive officer is not benchmarked to compensation packages received by executive officers of directors.peers in the industry. However, the Company strives to maintain a reasonable compensation package for each executive officer in order to retain incentives for such officer to continue to improve the Company’s performance in the future. The total compensation package received by an executive does not fluctuate as a result of increasing gains realized from one area of compensation. Thus, for example, if the stock price has grown significantly, resulting in large potential gains on vested stock awards, an executive’s base salary or bonus potential is not adjusted for that reason. The Company views each compensation element as a different means of encouraging and promoting performance. These elements are designed to work in tandem, not against each other.

In fiscal years 2006 and 2007, the Company’s stock price rose significantly to all time highs in 2007. As a result, the Company’s executive officers realized, or had the potential to realize, significant gains on their vested stock options. After considering this gain from prior compensation, the Company has elected, at this time, to abstain from issuing further stock options to executives for several reasons, including (1) the fair market value of any stock options issued at the current stock price would theoretically create a substantial, though unrealized, increase to such executives’ income and (2) the incentive to improve Company performance to increase stock price has minimized due to the substantial recent increases in such price. The Company has historically paid non-cash compensation to executives in the form of stock awards in order to align the financial interests of executives with those of shareholders. The Company expects to reinstitute stock awards to return the focus of executives to this alignment should the need arise in the future.

10

Base Annual Salaries

Before the Company’s initial public offering in 1997, and before the formation of the compensation committee, the Company entered into employment agreements with Messrs. Owens and Sheen. The compensation levels reflected in those employment agreements were established in July 1997 by negotiations among Messrs. Owens and Sheen, are entitledbefore they joined the Company, and representatives of OYO Corporation U.S.A., the Company’s sole stockholder at that time.

The base annual salaries of the Company’s named executive officers for fiscal year 2007 were as follows:

The compensation committee has the authority to participate in our 401(k) planadjust these base salaries; however, the employment agreements described above require that Messrs. Owens’ and any bonus planSheen’s base salaries not be reduced from the base amounts set forth above. Prior to fiscal year 2007, the Compensation Committee had not adjusted the base salaries of the executive officers since 2000. In fiscal year 2007, the Committee approved a base salary increase of $50,000 for each of the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, the Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer, and the Chief Financial Officer.

Annual Performance Bonuses

In October 2006, management recommended to the board of directors adoptsa comprehensive, company-wide cash bonus compensation plan (the “Bonus Plan”) for all employees for fiscal year 2007. The board of directors adopted the Bonus Plan in December 2007. The Bonus Plan set forth various targets and criteria for the Company’s operating performance and established a cash bonus, assessed on an individual basis, for employees of the Company. The financial targets were designed to receiveprovide incentives for the employees to work as a team to improve our financial results.

Every non-executive employee of the Company is eligible to participate in Tier I of the Bonus Plan, except for employees in the Russian Federation who participate in a local plan. Under Tier I, employees share proportionally in the Company’s profits based on each employee’s relative payroll. The Tier I bonus pool is established by accruing 30% of consolidated pretax profits (before bonus) above a specified range. Selected employees are eligible to participate in Tier II of the Bonus Plan, which applies after Tier I is fully funded. The Tier II Bonus pool is established by accruing 30% of consolidated pretax profits (before bonus) within a specified range above Tier I. Under Tier II, participants share in the bonus pool depending on the satisfaction of predefined goals by their respective working groups. Senior executive officers are eligible to participate in Tier III, which only applies after the Tier I and Tier II pools have been fully funded. The Tier III bonus pool is established by accruing 30% of consolidated pretax profits (before bonus) within a specified range above the Tier I and II ranges. Tier I and Tier III bonuses are paid if the Company reaches predetermined pretax profit (before bonus) levels. Tier II is based on attaining a predetermined consolidated pretax profits (before bonus) level as well as specific performance criteria of the group eligible for the bonus. The predetermined pretax profits (before bonus) levels as well as the specific performance criteria are re-evaluated annually. The groups eligible for Tier II bonuses in one year are not necessarily eligible the following year. The eligible groups are selected based on management’s goals for improvement across the Company.

Long-Term Stock-Based Compensation

We also believe that long-term incentive compensation is an important component of the Company’s compensation program and that the value of this compensation should be directly related to increases in

11

stockholder value. Therefore, in addition to base salaries and annual performance bonuses, the executive officers participate in the 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended, which allows the Company to grant long-term incentive compensation to its executive officers in the form of stock options and restricted stock awards. These options and restricted stock awards typically vest 25% per year over four years and are therefore intended to compensate executive officers for long-term appreciation in the market value of the common stock.

In connection with the Company’s initial public offering in November 1997, the Company granted options to purchase stock and restricted stock to the named executive officers. The amounts of these options and restricted stock were determined before the initial public offering by negotiations among Mr. Owens and representatives of OYO U.S.A. Options granted at the time of the initial public offering have an exercise price of $14 per share, which is equal to the initial public offering price, and vested over four years. These options, which were scheduled to expire in November 2007, were exercised in full by Mr. Owens, Mr. Sheen and Mr. McEntire in August 2007.

Historically, stock option grants were determined based on an individual’s annual compensation and their contribution to the company. The proposed stock option grants were presented by the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Board of Directors. As mentioned above, the Company has elected at this time to abstain from issuing further stock options to executives.

Relative Size of Major Compensation Elements

The combination of base salary, annual non-equity incentive awards and equity incentive awards comprise total direct compensation. In setting named executive officer compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the aggregate compensation payable to the executive and the form of the compensation. The Committee seeks to achieve the appropriate balance between immediate cash rewards and incentives for the achievement of both annual and long-term financial and non-financial objectives.

Timing of Compensation Decisions

All elements of executive officer compensation are reviewed and approved on an annual basis, generally in connection with the first Compensation Committee meeting of the fiscal year. Prior to fiscal year 2007, the Compensation Committee had not adjusted the base salaries of the executive officers since 2000. In fiscal year 2007, the Committee approved a base salary increase of $50,000 for each of the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, the Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer, and the Chief Financial Officer.

Benefits

We offer a variety of health and welfare and retirement programs to all eligible employees. Executives generally are eligible for the same benefit programs on the same basis as the rest of the broad-based employees. The health and welfare programs are intended to protect employees against catastrophic loss and encourage a healthy lifestyle. Our health and welfare programs include medical, wellness, pharmacy, dental, vision, life insurance and accidental death and disability. We provide life insurance equal to the annual salary with a maximum payout of $100,000.

We maintain a defined contribution plan pursuant to the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan covers all full-time employees who meet age and service requirements. The plan provides for pre-tax, elective employee contributions with a matching contribution from us at 50% of employee contributions, up to a maximum of 3% of the employee’s annual salary.

We offer vacation time determined by years of service. As of September 30, 2007, Mr. Owens had accrued 280 hours of vacation, Mr. Sheen had accrued 310 hours of vacation, Mr. McEntire had accrued 141 hours of vacation, and Ms. Rice had accrued 248 hours of vacation. Employees, including executives, may roll over up to 160 hours of unused vacation time to subsequent years.

12

Perquisites

As described above, we maintain life insurance policies on each named executive officer for the benefit of such executive’s family members. The maximum payout under each of these policies is $100,000. Additionally, the Company provides promotional shirts and hats to employees for use at Company-sponsored events and exhibitions.

Impact of Accounting and Tax Treatment

SFAS No. 123(R) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board requires a public company to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the award. Equity awards we grant are structured to comply with the requirements of SFAS No. 123R to maintain the appropriate equity accounting treatment.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount of compensation paid to the CEO and the four other most highly compensated executive officers that may be deducted by us in any year unless the compensation is performance-based compensation as described in Section 162(m) and the related regulations. Due to the increased stock price of the Company, among other factors, the Committee believes the compensation payable in excess of this amount for the four named executive officers will result in a material loss of tax deductions. The Company is considering methods to mitigate this loss.

Section 409A of the Code, as amended, provides that deferrals of compensation under a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for all taxable years are currently includible in gross income to the extent not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and not previously included in gross income, unless certain requirements are met. We structure any deferred compensation items to be in compliance with Section 409A.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information regarding compensation paid for services rendered during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 to each of our named executive officers:

Summary Compensation Table

13

Employee Equity Incentive Plans

We maintain the OYO Geospace Corporation 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Key Employee Plan”) and the 1999 Broad-Based Option Plan (the “Broad-Based Plan”) (collectively, the “Plans”) for the benefit of our full-time key employees. Under the Key Employee Plan, awards covering up to an additional 299,175 shares of Common Stock may be granted. Under the Broad-Based Plan, options to purchase up to an additional 18,800 shares of Common Stock may be granted. As previously mentioned, the Company has elected at this time to abstain from issuing further stock options to executives. Also, the Company has suspended option grants under the Broad-Based Plan.

The Plans are administered by the Compensation Committee. The individuals eligible to participate in the Plans are such of our full-time key employees, including officers and employee directors, as the respective committees may determine from time to time. However, executive officers and directors are not eligible to participate in the Broad-Based Plan.

Under the Broad-Based Plan, the Compensation Committee may grant nonqualified stock options. The purchase price of shares subject to an option granted under the Broad-Based Plan is determined by the Compensation Committee and may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock on the date of grant. Options granted under the Broad-Based Plan must be exercised within ten years from the date of grant. Unless otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee, the options vest immediately upon grant. The date on which options become exercisable is determined by the Committee and may not be a date that is fewer than six months after the date of grant. The Broad-Based Plan provides that if the Committee does not specify an exercise date, the options will become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

Under the Key Employee Plan, the Compensation Committee may grant incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options. The purchase price of shares subject to an incentive option granted under the Broad-Based Plan is determined by the Compensation Committee and may not be less than the greater of: (a) 100% of the fair market value of the shares of Stock on the date the option is granted or (b) the aggregate par value of the shares of Common Stock on the date the option is granted. The Committee in its discretion may provide that the price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased under an incentive option shall be more than 100% of fair market value. In the case of any 10% stockholder, the price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased under an incentive option shall not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the incentive option is granted. The price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased under a nonqualified option shall not be less than the greater of: (a) 100% of the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock on the date the option is granted or (b) the aggregate par value of the shares of Common Stock on the date the option is granted. The Committee in its discretion may provide that the price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased under a nonqualified option shall be more than 100% of fair market value.

Options granted under the Key Employee Plan must be exercised within ten years from the date of grant. In the case of a 10% stockholder, no incentive option shall be exercisable after the expiration of five years from the date the incentive option is granted.

14

Generally, awards granted under the Plans are not transferable by the holder other benefitsthan by will or under the laws of descent and vacation. distribution. Options granted under the Key Employee Plan terminate on the earlier of (i) the expiration date of the option or (ii) one day less than three months after the date the holder of the option terminates his or her employment with us for any reason other than the death, disability or the retirement of such holder. Options granted under the Broad-Based Plan terminate on the earlier of (i) the expiration date of the option or (ii) one day less than one month after the date the holder of the option terminates his or her employment with us for any reason other than the death, disability or the retirement of such holder. During such three-month or one-month period, as applicable, the holder may exercise the option in respect of the number of shares that were vested on the date of such severance of employment. In the event of severance because of the death, disability or retirement of a holder before the expiration date of the option, the option terminates on the earlier of such (i) expiration date or (ii) one year following the date of severance. During this period the holder, or his or her heirs, as the case may be, generally may exercise the option in respect of the number of shares that were vested on the date of severance because of death, disability or retirement.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The Company did not grant any stock awards or stock options to the named executive officers in fiscal year 2007 under either of the Plans.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

The following table summarizes certain information regarding unexercised options, vested stock and equity incentive plan awards outstanding as of the end of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 for each of the named executive officers:

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END TABLE (1)

15

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

The following table summarizes certain information regarding the exercise of stock options and the vesting of stock awards during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 for each of the named executive officers:

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE

Pension Benefits

We currently have no defined benefit pension plans.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We currently have no defined contribution plans which provide for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax qualified.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control

Pursuant to their employment agreements, each of Messrs. Owens and Sheen is entitled to receive the severance benefits described below upon termination of his employment unless the termination:

“Cause” is defined to mean the employee’s willful and continued failure to perform his duties after a demand for his performance of those duties or the employee’s willfully engaging in gross misconduct materially and demonstrably injurious to the Company. “Good Reason” is defined to mean a demotion, a reduction in base salary, a relocation of the employee’s base location of employment, the discontinuation of any employee benefit without comparable substitution, the failure of any successor of the Company to assume the employment agreement or a purported termination not in compliance with the employment agreement.

916

The severance benefits to which either Messr. Owens or Sheen would be entitled on termination include:

InThese payments would be due in a lump sum on the tenth day following the date of termination. The amounts paid are based on the salary rate in effect at the time of termination, unless the employee is terminating employment for Good Reason due to a reduction in salary, in which case the salary rate shall be the rate in effect prior to such reduction.

So long as Mr. Owens or Mr. Sheen is terminated without Cause, neither is required to perform any further agreement or action in order to receive these benefits. However, in connection with these employment agreements, each of Messrs. Owens and Sheen has agreed that he will not disclose or misappropriate any confidential information of the Company and that all intellectual property developed by either of Messrs. Owens and Sheen is the property of the Company.

If the employment of Mr. Owens had terminated on September 30, 2007, he would have received $1,060,040 in a lump sum payment plus any relocation and indemnity payments to which he is entitled and any costs and legal fees incurred in connection with any dispute over his employment agreement, and a gross-up for any applicable “excess parachute payment” tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

If the employment of Mr. Sheen had terminated on September 30, 2007, he would have received $981,536 in a lump sum payment plus any relocation and indemnity payments to which he is entitled and any costs and legal fees incurred in connection with any dispute over his employment agreement, and a gross-up for any applicable “excess parachute payment” tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

TheIn fiscal year 2007, the compensation committee compriseswas composed of Dr. Thomas L. Davis, and Mr. Charles H. Still.Still and Mr. Ryuzo Okuto. If elected, Mr. Richard C. White will replace Mr. Okuto as a member of the committee. Mr. Still iswas, during 2007, a partner in the law firm of Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., which provides legal services to the Company. Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. also provides legal services to OYO CorporationCompany, but has now retired as a partner and to OYO U.S.A. and its affiliates.is Of Counsel of such firm. Mr. Still also serves as Secretary of the Company in a non-executive capacity.

Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain talented management personnel and to reward management for the Company’s successful financial performance and for increasing stockholder value. We provide compensation and incentives through a combination of salaries, annual performance bonuses and long-term incentive stock-based awards.

Base Annual Salaries

Before the Company’s initial public offering in 1997, and before the formation of the compensation committee, the Company entered into employment agreements with Messrs. Owens and Sheen as described under “—Employment Agreements” above. The compensation levels reflected in those employment agreements were established in July 1997 by negotiations among Messrs. Owens and Sheen, before they joined the Company, and representatives of OYO U.S.A., the Company’s sole stockholder at that time.

The base annual salaries of the Company’s named executive officers forIn fiscal year 2006 were as follows.

The compensation committee has the authority to adjust these base salaries; however, the employment agreements described above require that Messrs. Owens’ and Sheen’s base salaries not be reduced from the base amounts set forth above.

Annual Performance Bonuses

In November 2005, management recommended to2007, the board of directors adopted a comprehensive, company-wide cash bonus compensation plan for all employees for fiscal year 2006. The board of directors adopted the plan in February 2006. The cash bonus plan set forth various targets and criteriawritten charter for the Company’s operating performance and established a cash bonus, assessed on an individual basis, for employees of the Company. The financial targets were designed to provide incentives for the employees to work as a team to improve our financial results.

10

Long-Term Stock-Based Compensation

We also believe that long-term incentive compensation is an important component of the Company’s compensation program and that the value of this compensation should be directly related to increases in stockholder value. Therefore, in addition to base salaries and annual performance bonuses, the executive officers participate in the 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended, which allows the Company to grant long-term incentive compensation to its executive officers in the form of stock options and restricted stock awards. These options and restricted stock awards typically vest 25% per year over four years and are therefore intended to compensate executive officers for long-term appreciation in the market value of the common stock.

In connection with the Company’s initial public offering in November 1997, the Company granted options to purchase stock and restricted stock to the named executive officers. The amounts of these options and restricted stock were determined before the initial public offering by negotiations among Mr. Owens and representatives of OYO U.S.A. Options granted at the time of the initial public offering have an exercise price of $14 per share, which is equal to the initial public offering price, and vested over four years.

Applicable Tax Code Provision

committee. The compensation committee has reviewedintends to review and reassess the potential consequences for the Companyadequacy of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which limits the tax deduction the Company can claim forits charter on an annual compensation in excess of $1 million to certain executives. This limit did not impact the Company in fiscal year 2006 and is not expected to impact the Company in fiscal year 2007.basis.

The information in this Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation shall not be deemed to be soliciting material, or be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this report by reference.

Thomas L. Davis, Ph.D.

Charles H. Still

Ryuzo Okuto

11

17

Common Stock Performance Comparisons

The following graphs compare the performance of the Company’s common stock with the performance of the Russell 2000 index and the Standard & Poor’s Oil & Gas Equipment and Services index as of each of the dates indicated.

The graph assumes $100 invested on September 30, 20012002 (a) in the Company’s common stock, (b) in the stocks comprising the Russell 2000 index on that day and (c) in the stocks comprising the Standard & Poor’s Oil & Gas Equipment and Services index. Reinvestment of all dividends on stocks comprising the two indices is assumed.

The foregoing graphs are based on historical data and are not necessarily indicative of future performance. These graphs shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to the Regulations of 14A or 14C under the Exchange Act or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.

1218

CODE OF ETHICS

The Company has adopted a general code of business conduct that applies to all employees, and a supplemental code of ethics that applies to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers. The general code of business conduct and supplemental code of ethics are available on the Company’s website. The address of the Company’s website is http://www.oyogeospace.com.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Mr. Kobayashi, a director of the Company, is a director and senior executive officer of OYO Corporation and the President of OYO U.S.A. Mr. Kobayashi also holds offices with many subsidiaries of OYO U.S.A. Mr. Still, also a director of the Company, is the Secretary of OYO U.S.A. and also serves in that position with respect to other subsidiaries of OYO U.S.A. Mr. Still iswas, during 2007, a partner in the law firm of Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., which provides legal services to the Company.Company, but has retired as a partner and is Of Counsel of such firm.

Pursuant to a Master Sales Agreement that the Company entered into with OYO Corporation before its initial public offering, the Company and OYO Corporation purchase products from one another at scheduled discounts of 5% to 20% off the seller’s list prices. In addition, OYO Corporation purchases printhead-related products from other Japanese corporations and then resells those products to the Company. For its service and assistance in these transactions, OYO Corporation typically marks up its cost by 5%. The Company believes that by purchasing these printhead-related products through OYO Corporation, it received a more favorable price than it could have obtained if it were to negotiate directly for their purchase.

In fiscal year 2006,2007, the Company sold approximately $600,000$500,000 in goods to OYO Corporation and its affiliates other than the Company and purchased approximately $100,000$3,500 in goods from OYO Corporation and its affiliates other than the Company (including the products covered by the Master Sales Agreement).

The Company does not have a formal, written policy with respect to related person transactions.

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

UHY LLP (“UHY”) served as the Company’s principal independent public accountants for the 2007 fiscal year. Representatives of UHY are expected to attend the annual meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) served as the Company’s principal independent public accountants for the 2006 fiscal year. On December 7, 2007, the Company notified PwC that the Company’s Audit Committee, after considerable deliberations, decided to dismiss PwC as the Company’s principal independent public accountants.

PwC’s reports on the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and neither such report was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principle.

As the Company reported in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, as of September 30, 2005, the Company did not maintain effective controls over the year-end physical inventory. Specially, as of such date, the controls in place to ensure an accurate count and verify the existence of inventory at the Company’s Pinemont facility in Houston, Texas were not properly designed and thus failed to detect counting errors and other inaccuracies prior to the posting of the physical inventory adjustments to the general ledger. This control deficiency resulted in audit adjustments to the Company’s 2005 annual consolidated financial statements to correct inventory and cost of goods sold. As the Company has previously disclosed, this

19

control deficiency could have resulted in a misstatement of inventory and cost of goods sold that would have resulted in a material misstatement to the Company’s annual or interim consolidated financial statements for such period. Accordingly, management determined that as of September 30, 2005, this control deficiency constituted a material weakness. The Company’s audit committee discussed the subject matter of this material weakness with PwC. The Company has authorized PwC to respond fully to the inquiries of the successor accountant concerning the subject matter of this material weakness. There were no other “reportable events” under section (a)(1)(v) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K that occurred during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 or through December 7, 2006. Management determined that this material weakness was remediated as of December 31, 2005, as disclosed in Item 4 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005.

During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 and through December 7, 2006, there were no disagreements with PwC on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement, if not resolved to the satisfaction of PwC, would have caused PwC to make reference thereto in its reports on the financial statements for such years.

The Company has provided PwC with a copy of the above disclosures. A copy of PwC’s letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission required by Item 304(a) of Regulation S-K is included as Exhibit 16.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2006.

The Company’s Audit Committee further determined, after considerable deliberations,decided to selectengage UHY LLP (“UHY”) to serve as the Company’s principal independent registered public accountantsaccounting firm effective on December 7, 2006. UHY will act as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm beginning with the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007.

During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 and through December 7, 2006, the Company did not consult with UHY regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, or (ii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K) or a reportable event (as described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K).

Hein & Associates LLP (“Hein”) served as the Company’s independent tax consultants for the 2007 fiscal year, subjectyear. PwC had provided tax-related services to negotiation of a satisfactory fee arrangement. Representatives of UHY are expected to attend the meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.Company in prior fiscal years.

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, including for professional services rendered by the Company’s principal accountants in connection with the audit of internal control over financial reporting in compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Forms 10-Q were $717,000$425,242 for professional services rendered by UHY during the 20062007 fiscal year, and $284,000$717,000 for professional services rendered by PwC during the 20052006 fiscal year.

Audit Related Fees

There were no fees billed for audit-related services not disclosed in “Audit Fees” above for the 20062007 fiscal year or under that same heading in the proxy statement filed in connection with the Company’s 20062007 annual meeting of stockholders for the 20052006 fiscal year.

13

Tax Fees

The tax services, including tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning are provided by Hein separate from services provided by the company’s principal accountants. The aggregate fees billed by the Company’s principal accountantsPwC for tax services,

20

including tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning totaled approximately $119,000 in fiscal year 2006 and $41,000 in fiscal year 2005.2006. The fees in fiscal yearsyear 2006 and 2005 were primarily for the preparation of tax returns.

All Other Fees

The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the Company’s principal accountants in connection with preparing for compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002There were $11,000 for the 2005 fiscal year. The fees billed for professional services rendered by the Company’s principal accountants in connection with compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 are indicated above under the heading “—Audit Fees”.

Otherno fees billed by the Company’s principal independent public accountants duringfor other services not disclosed above in “Audit Fees”, “Audit Related Fees” or “Tax Fees” above for the 2007 or 2006 fiscal year 2005 totaled approximately $12,708, which fees were billedyears or under that same heading in connection with communications with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the registration statements on Form S-8proxy statement filed by the Company in connection with the Company’s 1999 Broad-Based Option Plan and amendments to2007 annual meeting of stockholders for the Company’s 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan and 1997 Non-Employee Director Plan and a survey performed by the Company’s principal accountants’ Russian office pertaining to certain Russian compensation matters.2006 fiscal year.

Compatibility of Certain Fees with Independent Accountants’ Independence

The audit committee has considered whether the provision of services which would be covered under the subheading “All Other Fees” above is compatible with maintaining the Company’s principal accountants’ independence.

The audit committee has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures pursuant to which the engagement of any accountant is approved. Such procedures govern the ways in which the audit committee will pre-approve audit and various categories of non-audit services that the auditor provides to the Company and its subsidiaries. In accordance with this policy, the audit committee had given its approval for the provision of audit services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPUHY for the fiscal year endingended September 30, 2006 and had also given its general pre-approval for the performance by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP of certain types of audit-related, tax and permitted non-audit services.2007. Services which have not received pre-approval must receive specific approval of the audit committee. The audit committee is informed of each such engagement in a timely manner, and such procedures do not include delegation of the audit committee’s responsibilities to management. All audit tax and other services the contracts for which were entered into in fiscal year 20062007 were pre-approved by the audit committee.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

Based solely on a review of reports on those filings furnished to the Company and written representations from reporting persons that no additional reports were required, the Company believes that during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006,2007, all officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders complied with all filing requirements applicable to them.them, except that one Form 4 which was filed by Mr. Sheen in connection with the exercise of options was not timely reported.

14

PROPOSALS FOR NEXT ANNUAL MEETING; OTHER MATTERS

Any appropriate proposals of holders of common stock intended to be presented at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company to be held in 20082009 must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices, 7007 Pinemont Drive, Houston, Texas 77040-6601, no later than October 10, 2007September 6, 2008 to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting. A matter as to which the Company receives notice that is proposed to be brought before the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company in 20082009 outside the process of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rule on stockholder proposals (described in the preceding sentence) will be considered not properly brought before that meeting, and will be out of order, unless the notice as to that matter meets the requirements of the advance notice provisions of the Company’s by-laws. That provision requires notice of any matter, including nomination of a director, to be submitted by a stockholder at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company in 20082009 to be received by the Company no later than December 9, 2007,23, 2008, and to be received by the Company no earlier than August 11, 2007.25, 2008.

The cost of solicitation of proxies in the accompanying form will be paid by the Company. In addition to solicitation by use of the mails, the directors, officers or employees of the company may solicit the return of proxies by telephone, telecopy or in person.

1521

Proxy - OYO Geospace Corporation

This Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors.

Proxy-Annual Meeting of Stockholders – February 21, 200728, 2008

The undersigned holder of Common Stock of OYO Geospace Corporation (“OYOG”) hereby appoints Ryuzo OkutoCharles H. Still and Thomas L. Davis, Ph. D.,Katsuhiko Kobayashi, or either of them, proxies of the undersigned with full power of substitution, to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of OYOG to be held at 9:00 a.m. on the 21st28th of February, 2007,2008, at the OYOG corporate headquarters at 7007 Pinemont Drive, Houston, Texas, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, the number of votes that the undersigned would be entitled to cast if personally present.

In their discretion, the above named proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof and upon matters incident to the conduct of the meeting.

This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder.If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of the director nominees named on the reverse side, or if any one or more of the nominees becomes unavailable, FOR another nominee or other nominees to be selected by the Board of Directors.

Please mark, sign, date and return in the enclosed envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States.

(continued and to be signed on other side)

OYO Geospace Corporation

Annual Meeting Proxy Card

[B] Authorized Signatures—Sign Here— This section must be completed for your instructions to be executed.

NOTE: Please sign your name(s) EXACTLY as your name(s) appear(s) on this proxy. All joint holders must sign. When signing as attorney, trustee, executor, administrator, guardian or corporate officer, please provide your FULL title.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy)